+86 29 8881 0979

HOME » What type of antenna is used in radio waves

What type of antenna is used in radio waves

Dipole antennas (λ/2 length) are commonly used for radio waves, offering 1.64 dBi gain and 50-75Ω impedance, with omnidirectional radiation patterns for frequencies ranging from kHz to GHz, depending on their size and material.

​Basic Antenna Types​

Radio antennas come in many shapes and sizes, each designed for specific ​​frequency ranges, power levels, and applications​​. The most common types include ​​dipole, monopole, loop, patch, and Yagi antennas​​, with variations optimized for ​​efficiency, cost, and signal strength​​. For example, a simple ​​half-wave dipole​​ operates efficiently at ​​50-75 ohms impedance​​, covering frequencies from ​​3 MHz to 300 MHz​​, while a ​​monopole antenna​​ (often used in car radios) requires a ground plane and typically has a ​​5-10 dB lower gain​​ than a dipole.

​Loop antennas​​, often used in ​​AM radios (530–1700 kHz)​​, have a ​​high Q factor​​, making them selective but narrowband. On the other hand, ​​patch antennas​​, common in ​​Wi-Fi (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz) and GPS (1.575 GHz)​​, are compact (often ​​10×10 cm or smaller​​) and low-cost, with ​​5-8 dBi gain​​. ​​Yagi antennas​​, popular in ​​TV reception (470–862 MHz)​​, can achieve ​​10-15 dBi gain​​ but require precise ​​element spacing (0.15–0.25 wavelengths)​​ for optimal performance.

The ​​radiation pattern​​ of an antenna determines how it distributes energy. A ​​dipole​​ has a ​​figure-8 pattern​​, while a ​​monopole​​ is omnidirectional but loses ​​3 dB efficiency​​ due to ground dependency. ​​Patch antennas​​ are directional, with a ​​60–80° beamwidth​​, making them ideal for ​​point-to-point links​​. ​​Loop antennas​​ can be ​​small (λ/10) or large (λ/2)​​, with larger loops offering ​​better efficiency (up to 90%)​​ but requiring more space.

Material choice also impacts performance. ​​Copper and aluminum​​ are common due to ​​low resistance (1.68×10⁻⁸ Ω·m for copper)​​, while ​​fiberglass or plastic​​ may be used for structural support. ​​Antenna efficiency​​ typically ranges from ​​50% to 95%​​, with losses coming from ​​impedance mismatch, conductor resistance, and environmental factors​​ like ​​humidity (which can increase losses by 2-5%)​​.

For ​​low-power applications (under 1W)​​, such as ​​Bluetooth or ZigBee (2.4 GHz)​​, small ​​PCB trace antennas​​ (just ​​5-30 mm long​​) are cost-effective but suffer from ​​low gain (0-3 dBi)​​. In contrast, ​​high-power broadcast antennas (1 kW+)​​ use ​​thick aluminum elements​​ to handle ​​high voltage (up to 50 kV in AM towers)​​ without arcing.

​Dipole Antenna Design​

A dipole antenna is one of the simplest and most widely used designs, offering ​​good efficiency (70-90%)​​ across a broad ​​frequency range (3 MHz to 3 GHz)​​. The classic ​​half-wave dipole​​ is ​​λ/2 in length​​, meaning a ​​146 MHz (2-meter band) dipole​​ would be about ​​1 meter long (0.5 × 2 m wavelength)​​. Its ​​impedance is roughly 73 ohms​​, making it a natural match for ​​50-ohm coaxial cables​​ with minimal ​​SWR (Standing Wave Ratio) under 1.5:1​​ when properly tuned.

​”A dipole’s performance drops sharply if shortened beyond 90% of its ideal length—a 10% length reduction can increase SWR from 1.5:1 to over 3:1, wasting 25% of transmitted power.”​

The ​​radiation pattern​​ of a dipole is a ​​figure-8 shape​​, with ​​maximum gain (2.15 dBi)​​ perpendicular to the wire and ​​nulls at the ends​​. For ​​omnidirectional coverage​​, a ​​vertical dipole​​ is often used, though it loses ​​3 dB gain​​ compared to a horizontal setup. ​​Multiband dipoles​​, like fan or trap dipoles, can operate on ​​2-4 frequencies​​ (e.g., ​​7 MHz and 14 MHz​​) by adding ​​LC traps (inductor-capacitor circuits)​​ that isolate segments at different wavelengths.

​Material thickness​​ matters—thicker conductors (e.g., ​​3-6 mm copper tubing​​) improve ​​bandwidth (up to 15% wider than thin wires)​​ and handle ​​higher power (1 kW+)​​ without heating. A ​​thin wire dipole (1 mm diameter)​​ might only handle ​​100W at 14 MHz​​ before risking ​​resistive losses (5-10% efficiency drop)​​. ​​Height above ground​​ also affects performance: mounting at ​​λ/2 (10m for 14 MHz)​​ reduces ground reflections, boosting ​​gain by 3-6 dB​​ over a ​​λ/4 (5m) installation​​.

For ​​portable or temporary setups​​, ​​collapsible fiberglass dipoles​​ (weighing ​​under 500g​​) are popular, though they sacrifice ​​5-10% efficiency​​ versus solid metal. ​​Feeding a dipole​​ requires care—a ​​balun (balanced-to-unbalanced transformer)​​ prevents cable radiation, especially above ​​30 MHz​​, where ​​common-mode currents​​ can distort the pattern. A ​​1:1 current balun​​ typically costs ​50​​ and cuts ​​RFI (Radio Frequency Interference)​​ by ​​10-20 dB​​.

​Yagi Antenna Uses​

Yagi antennas are ​​high-gain directional antennas​​ widely used in ​​TV reception (470–862 MHz), amateur radio (14–440 MHz), and point-to-point wireless links (900 MHz–5.8 GHz)​​. A typical ​​3-element Yagi​​ provides ​​8–10 dBi gain​​, while larger ​​10–15 element designs​​ can reach ​​14–18 dBi​​, boosting range by ​​2–4x​​ compared to a dipole. Their ​​forward beamwidth​​ is narrow (​​30–60°​​), making them ideal for ​​long-distance communication​​ but requiring precise ​​alignment within ±5°​​ for optimal performance.

​Application​ ​Frequency​ ​Elements​ ​Gain (dBi)​ ​Beamwidth​ ​Typical Range​
​TV Reception​ 470–862 MHz 5–10 10–14 40–60° 30–80 km
​Amateur Radio (HF)​ 14–30 MHz 3–6 6–9 60–90° 500–1500 km
​Wi-Fi (PtP)​ 2.4–5.8 GHz 8–16 12–18 20–40° 5–20 km
​RFID Tracking​ 865–928 MHz 4–8 8–12 50–70° 10–50 m

The ​​reflector and director elements​​ in a Yagi are ​​10–20% shorter/longer​​ than the driven element, creating ​​phase interference​​ that focuses energy forward. For example, a ​​5-element 144 MHz Yagi​​ has a ​​reflector (~1.05× driven length) and directors (~0.9× driven length)​​, spaced at ​​0.15–0.25 wavelengths (30–50 cm)​​. Misalignment by ​​just 10% in spacing​​ can ​​drop gain by 2–3 dB​​ and increase ​​side lobes by 5 dB​​, causing interference.

​Material choice​​ affects durability and performance. ​​Aluminum elements (3–6 mm thick)​​ handle ​​100W+ transmit power​​ with ​​<1 dB loss​​, while ​​fiberglass-encased Yagis​​ (common in ​​marine/aviation use​​) survive ​​150+ km/h winds​​ but suffer ​​0.5–1 dB higher losses​​. For ​​low-cost setups​​, a ​300–600 for 15-element 432 MHz​​) offer ​​3–5 dB better gain​​ and ​​tighter beamwidths​​.

​Mounting height​​ is critical. A ​​6m mast​​ improves ​​line-of-sight range by 30%​​ over a ​​3m install​​ due to reduced ground absorption. For ​​UHF (400+ MHz)​​, even ​​1m height changes​​ can alter ​​signal strength by 2–3 dB​​. In ​​urban areas​​, Yagis often face ​​multipath interference​​, but a ​​10° tilt adjustment​​ can ​​reduce dropouts by 20%​​.

​Loop Antenna Features​

Loop antennas are compact, versatile radiators that excel in ​​space-constrained applications (portable radios, RFID, HF reception)​​ while offering ​​unique directional nulls​​ for interference rejection. Unlike dipoles, their ​​circular/rectangular shape​​ creates a ​​magnetic field dominance​​, making them ​​3-5x less sensitive to nearby conductors​​ than wire antennas. A ​​1-meter diameter loop​​ tuned to ​​7 MHz​​ achieves ​​70-80% radiation efficiency​​, comparable to a dipole but in ​​1/10th the footprint​​.

​Parameter​ ​Small Loop (λ/10)​ ​Large Loop (λ/2)​ ​Ferrite Loop (AM Radio)​
​Typical Size​ 0.1-0.3 m diameter 1-3 m diameter 0.05-0.1 m (rod)
​Frequency Range​ 3-30 MHz 1-30 MHz 0.5-1.7 MHz
​Efficiency​ 10-30% 70-90% 5-15%
​Q Factor​ 100-300 50-150 200-500
​Gain​ -10 to -5 dBi 0-2 dBi -20 to -15 dBi

​Small loops (λ/10 or smaller)​​ trade ​​efficiency for portability​​—a ​​0.5m copper loop at 14 MHz​​ radiates just ​​15% of input power​​ but fits in a backpack, while a ​​2m aluminum loop​​ at the same frequency hits ​​85% efficiency​​. The ​​Q factor (quality factor)​​ dictates bandwidth; a ​​high-Q (300+) loop​​ might cover ​​only 10 kHz at 7 MHz​​, requiring ​​precision tuning capacitors (±1 pF tolerance)​​ to maintain ​​SWR <2:1​​. This makes them ideal for ​​narrowband applications like HF amateur radio​​, where ​​10 kHz bandwidth​​ suffices.

​Directional nulls​​ are the loop’s killer feature. Rotating a ​​vertically polarized loop​​ creates ​​20-30 dB nulls​​ at 90° to the plane, letting operators ​​reject interference​​ from specific directions—critical for ​​MW (530-1700 kHz) DXing​​. A ​​3m diameter loop​​ can achieve ​​5 μV/m sensitivity at 1 MHz​​, outperforming most ​​active antennas​​ in high-noise urban environments. However, ​​ferrite rod loops​​ (common in AM radios) sacrifice ​​gain (-20 dBi)​​ for ​​size (10 cm rods)​​, needing ​​50+ turns of wire​​ to compensate for low ​​permeability (μ=100-400)​​.

​Construction materials​​ dramatically affect performance. ​​1/4″ copper tubing​​ offers ​​0.5 dB better efficiency​​ than ​​12 AWG wire​​ at ​​30 MHz​​ due to lower ​​skin effect losses (Rac/Rdc ratio <1.1)​​. For ​​portable use​​, ​​3mm diameter aluminum loops​​ weigh ​​300-500g​​ and handle ​​100W PEP​​ when using ​​vacuum variable capacitors (500 units)​​. Budget builds with ​​PVC frames and RG-58 coax loops​​ work but suffer ​​3-5 dB extra loss​​ above ​​10 MHz​​.

​Patch Antenna Applications​

Patch antennas, also called microstrip antennas, dominate modern wireless systems where ​​low profile (5-10 mm thick), lightweight (50-200g), and mass production (unit cost <$5)​​ are critical. These flat, PCB-style antennas deliver ​​5-8 dBi gain​​ with ​​60-80° beamwidth​​, making them ideal for ​​Wi-Fi routers (2.4/5 GHz), GPS modules (1.575 GHz), and 5G small cells (3.5-28 GHz)​​. A typical ​​40x40mm patch​​ on ​​FR4 substrate (εr=4.3)​​ achieves ​​85% radiation efficiency​​ at ​​2.4 GHz​​, while advanced ​​ceramic-loaded patches (εr=10-20)​​ shrink sizes to ​​15x15mm​​ for ​​wearable IoT devices​​.

The ​​resonant frequency​​ depends on ​​patch length (≈λ/2 in dielectric)​​, with ​​1% dimensional tolerance​​ causing ​​5-10 MHz shifts​​ at ​​5 GHz​​. For ​​dual-band operation​​, stacked patches or slots cut ​​15-20% bandwidth (e.g., 2.4-2.5 GHz + 5.15-5.85 GHz)​​ but add ​​0.5-1 dB insertion loss​​. In ​​urban 5G deployments​​, ​​8×8 patch arrays (256 elements total)​​ produce ​​24 dBi gain​​ with ​​±15° electronic beam steering​​, enabling ​​1 Gbps throughput​​ at ​​500m range​​ despite ​​building penetration losses of 20-30 dB​​.

​Feeding methods​​ significantly impact performance. ​​Edge-fed patches​​ are simplest but suffer ​​3-5% impedance mismatch​​, while ​​probe-fed designs​​ improve ​​return loss to <-15 dB​​ at the cost of ​​narrower bandwidth (4-6% vs. 8-12%)​​. For ​​automotive radar (77 GHz)​​, ​​aperture-coupled patches​​ achieve ​​>90% efficiency​​ by separating feedlines from radiators, though requiring ​​0.1mm precision laminates ($200+/panel)​​.

​Environmental resilience​​ separates consumer-grade from industrial patches. Standard ​​epoxy-coated patches​​ degrade ​​gain by 0.5 dB/year​​ under ​​UV exposure​​, while ​​PTFE-based versions​​ maintain ​​±0.2 dB stability​​ across ​​-40°C to +85°C​​. In ​​drones​​, ​​flexible patches (0.1mm polyimide films)​​ survive ​​10,000+ bend cycles​​ but pay ​​2-3 dB efficiency penalties​​ versus rigid boards.

​Choosing the Right Antenna​

Selecting the optimal antenna involves balancing ​​frequency (1 MHz to 100 GHz), gain (0 to 30 dBi), size (1 cm to 10 m), and budget (5,000)​​ against real-world constraints like ​​obstruction density, power limits, and deployment timelines​​. A ​​5G small cell​​ might need a ​​64-element patch array (10 helix antenna​​ for ​​900 MHz LoRa transmissions​​ through crops. Mismatches here are costly—a ​​3 dB gain drop​​ at ​​2.4 GHz Wi-Fi​​ cuts ​​range by 30%​​, and a ​​10° beamwidth error​​ in a ​​satellite ground station​​ can ​​lose 50% of downlink data​​.

​Use Case​ ​Antenna Type​ ​Key Parameters​ ​Cost Range​ ​Tradeoffs​
​Urban 5G​ 8×8 Patch Array 24 dBi gain, ±15° steering, 28 GHz 500 5% efficiency loss/mmWave rain fade
​Rural HF Comms​ Dipole 7 MHz, 73Ω, 50W PEP 100 Needs 10m+ height, 50m space
​Drone FPV​ Circular Polarized 5.8 GHz, 8 dBi, 80° beamwidth 50 20% shorter range if polarization mismatched
​Smart Meter​ PCB Trace 868 MHz, -1 dBi, 10x5mm 3 30% lower efficiency vs external antenna
​Satellite TV​ Offset Dish + LNB 12 GHz, 40 dBi, 60cm diameter 200 0.5° alignment error = 10 dB loss

​Frequency dictates physics​​—below ​​30 MHz​​, wavelengths demand ​​10-100m structures​​ (dipoles, loops), while ​​mmWave (30+ GHz)​​ works with ​​5mm patches​​ but suffers ​​20 dB/km atmospheric loss​​. A ​​144 MHz Yagi​​ achieves ​​12 dBi gain​​ with ​​1m elements​​, but a ​​5.8 GHz version​​ needs ​​5cm elements​​ for similar performance. ​​Material conductivity​​ matters too—​​copper antennas​​ show ​​1-2 dB better efficiency​​ than aluminum at ​​UHF​​, but cost ​​3x more per kilogram​​.

​Environment alters requirements​​. In ​​forests​​, ​​900 MHz dipoles​​ outperform ​​2.4 GHz patches​​ by ​​8-10 dB​​ due to foliage penetration. For ​​marine use​​, ​​stainless steel whips​​ survive ​​salt spray​​ but lose ​​15% efficiency​​ versus brass. Urban canyon effects can ​​attenuate 5.8 GHz signals by 40 dB/100m​​, forcing ​​high-gain sector antennas (17 dBi)​​ just to cover ​​500m line-of-sight​​.

​Power handling​​ separates consumer from professional gear. A ​​PCB trace antenna​​ fries at ​​2W continuous​​, while a ​​3/8″ heliax dipole​​ handles ​​1 kW at 50 MHz​​. For ​​EMC testing​​, ​​biconical antennas (8k)​​ tolerate ​​100V/m fields​​ but provide ​​just 2 dBi gain​​. Always check ​​VSWR specs​​—a ​​1.5:1 mismatch​​ wastes ​​4% power​​, while ​​3:1​​ dumps ​​25%​​ as heat.

latest news
Scroll to Top
Blank Form (#3)